Comparison of Risk-Adjusted 30-Day Postoperative Mortality and Morbidity in Department of Veterans Affairs Hospitals and Selected University Medical Centers: General Surgical Operations in Men
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Journal of the American College of Surgeons
- Vol. 204 (6) , 1103-1114
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2007.02.068
Abstract
Background We used data from the Patient Safety in Surgery Study to compare patient populations, operative characteristics, and unadjusted and risk-adjusted 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity between the Veterans Affairs (VA) (n = 94,098) and private (n = 18,399) sectors for general surgery operations in men. Study Design This is a prospective cohort study. Trained nurses collected preoperative risk factors, operative variables, and 30-day postoperative mortality and morbidity outcomes in male patients undergoing major general surgery operations at 128 VA medical centers and 14 university medical centers from October 1, 2001, to September 30, 2004. Multiple logistic regression analysis was used to identify preoperative predictors of postoperative mortality and morbidity. An indicator variable for VA versus private-sector medical center was added to the model to determine if risk-adjusted outcomes were significantly different in the two systems. Results The unadjusted 30-day mortality rate was higher in the VA compared with the private sector (2.62% versus 2.03%, p = 0.0002); unadjusted morbidity rate was lower in the VA compared with the private sector (12.24% versus 13.99%, p < 0.0001). After risk adjustment, odds ratio for mortality for the VA versus private sector was 1.23 (95% CI, 1.08–1.41). For morbidity after risk adjustment, the indicator variable for health-care system just missed statistical significance (p = 0.0585). Thirty-day postoperative mortality was comparable in the VA and private sector for very common operations but was higher in the VA for less common, more complex operations. Conclusions In general surgery operations in men, the VA appeared to have a higher risk-adjusted mortality rate compared with the private sector, but differences in mortality ascertainment in the two sectors might account for some of this effect. The higher mortality in the VA could be the result of higher mortality in the less common, more complex operations. There is a trend toward lower risk-adjusted morbidity in the VA compared with the private sector.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Assessment of the Reliability of Data Collected for the Department of Veterans Affairs National Surgical Quality Improvement ProgramJournal of the American College of Surgeons, 2007
- Laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass at a Veterans Affairs and high-volume academic facilities: a comparison of institutional outcomesThe American Journal of Surgery, 2005
- Comparative Analysis of Outcome Following Liver Transplantation in US VeteransAmerican Journal of Transplantation, 2004
- Survival and quality of life after organ transplantation in veterans and nonveteransThe American Journal of Surgery, 2003
- In-Hospital Mortality Following Coronary Artery Bypass Graft Surgery in Veterans Health Administration and Private Sector HospitalsMedical Care, 2003
- The National Surgical Quality Improvement Program in Non-Veterans Administration HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 2002
- The Department of Veterans Affairs' NSQIPAnnals of Surgery, 1998
- Comparison of Postoperative Mortality in VA and Private HospitalsAnnals of Surgery, 1993
- Comparative analysis of total knee arthroplasty in two health care delivery systemsThe Journal of Arthroplasty, 1992
- Comparison of Survival in Cardiac Surgery at a Veterans Administration Hospital and Its Affiliated University HospitalArchives of Surgery, 1988