PLURALIST AND ASSIMILATIONIST MODELS OF ETHNIC SETTLEMENT IN LONDON 1991
- 1 April 1997
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie
- Vol. 88 (2) , 120-134
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9663.1997.tb01591.x
Abstract
London 1991 census data are used to examine two theories of ethnic minority adjustment to dominant societies and their accompanying spatial patterns. The assimilationist model suggests a complete diffusion of residence over time and high rates of intermarriage or cohabitation; the pluralist model suggests continuing, moderately high levels of segregation and high degrees of social closure. The article argues that in London, die Caribbean population is following the melting pot route both in spatial and marital terms, while the Bangladeshi population is following the pluralist route. Indian patterns contain elements of each, but the high levels of concentration in the core settlements and high rates of homogamy, suggests more pluralist than melting pot trajectory.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Does Britain Have Ghettos?Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 1996
- Caribbean tenants in council housing: ‘Race’, class and genderNew Community, 1993
- A geographical perspective on the 1981 urban riots in EnglandEthnic and Racial Studies, 1986
- The Employment Performance of Established Manufacturing Industry in the Scottish New TownsUrban Studies, 1984
- Race, Class and the Allocation of Public Housing in BritainUrban Studies, 1984
- The Contribution of Council House Allocation to West Indian Desegregation in London, 1961-71Urban Studies, 1980
- ASPECTS OF THE SCALE PROBLEM IN THE CALCULATION OF SEGREGATION INDICES: LONDON AND BIRMINGHAM, 1961 AND 1971Tijdschrift Voor Economische En Sociale Geografie, 1976
- Ethnic Differentiation: Ecological Aspects of a Multidimensional ConceptPublished by Elsevier ,1972
- A Methodological Analysis of Segregation IndexesAmerican Sociological Review, 1955
- Population Succession in ChicagoAmerican Journal of Sociology, 1950