Alternative Reproductive Behaviors: Three Discrete Male Morphs in Paracerceis sculpta, an Intertidal Isopod from the Northern Gulf of California
- 1 May 1987
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Oxford University Press (OUP) in Journal of Crustacean Biology
- Vol. 7 (2) , 318-327
- https://doi.org/10.2307/1548612
Abstract
Paracerceis sculpta breeds in intertidal sponges, Leucetta losangelensis, where males employ 1 of 3 discrete alternative reproductive behaviors. Elaborate alpha-males attract females to spongocoels where mating and brooding of young by females occurs. Variance in the number of females per alpha-male is high (N = 0-11). Smaller beta-males, resembling females, and tiny gamma-males, resembling juveniles, invade spongocoels containing alpha-males and sexually receptive females. Alpha-, beta-, and gamma-males maintained in the laboratory do not molt or grow, and the 3 morphs differ in the relative amounts of energy they invest in somatic versus gonadal tissue (gamma > beta > alpha). Alternative male reproductive behaviors may have evolved in P. sculpta, since intensifying sexual selection on alpha-males allowed only the most competitive alphas to mate. Males that obtained mates by avoiding direct competition with alphas (e.g., mimicking females or stealing mates) may have persisted, despite their reduced fitness, because they experienced greater fitness than competitively inferior alphas. Similar selective pressures and thus similar male polymorphisms probably exist in other Crustacea.This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Alternative Male Strategies: Genetic Differences in CricketsScience, 1981
- The intensity of sexual selection in relation to male sexual behaviour, female choice, and sperm precedenceAnimal Behaviour, 1980
- SEXUAL SELECTION AND DIMORPHISM IN TWO DEMES OF A SYMBIOTIC, PAIR‐BONDING SNAPPING SHRIMPEvolution, 1980
- Sexual Parasitism in the Green Tree Frog ( Hyla cinerea )Science, 1978
- Sexual dimorphism in crayfish chelae: functional significance linked to reproductive activitiesCanadian Journal of Zoology, 1976