Improved model selection criterion
- 1 January 1999
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Communications in Statistics - Simulation and Computation
- Vol. 28 (1) , 51-71
- https://doi.org/10.1080/03610919908813535
Abstract
In this article, we propose a new model selection criterion with a penalty function based on the penalty functions of the Bayesian information criterion (BIC) of Schwartz (1978) and Theil’s (1961) R2 criterion. We compare the performance of this new criterion with some commonly used model selection criteria in the context of selecting regressors for the linear regression model. We show that this new criterion is strongly consistent, very competitive and usually selects more parsimonious models compared to Akaike’s (1973) information criterion (AIC), R2 and the generalized cross validation (GCV) criteria but is generally less parsimonious than BIC.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Comments on testing economic theories and the use of model selection criteriaJournal of Econometrics, 1995
- A comparison of model selection criteriaEconometric Reviews, 1992
- Regression and time series model selection in small samplesBiometrika, 1989
- Maximum likelihood principle and model selection when the true model is unspecifiedJournal of Multivariate Analysis, 1988
- The Durbin-Watson Bounds Test and Regressions Without an InterceptAustralian Economic Papers, 1981
- Estimating the Dimension of a ModelThe Annals of Statistics, 1978
- TESTING FOR SERIAL CORRELATION IN LEAST SQUARES REGRESSION. IIBiometrika, 1951