PROBLEMS WITH “SOFT” POLYTOMIES
- 1 June 1996
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Cladistics
- Vol. 12 (2) , 139-145
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-0031.1996.tb00198.x
Abstract
- The "soft" assumption attributes polytomies to lack of data, not simultaneous cladogenesis (the "hard" assumption). Most systematists prefer the first interpretation, but most parsimony programs implicitly use the second. Results can thus be inconsistent with initial assumptions. Under certain circumstances that seem especially typical for large data sets treating higher taxa, it may be valid to eliminate both compatible and incompatible polytomous trees from consideration. Consistent treatment of soft polytomies can reduce the ambiguity of cladistic solutions and improve the resolution, and testability, of phylogenetic hypotheses.Keywords
This publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- Arbitrary Resolutions, Missing Entries, and the Problem of Zero-Length Branches in Parsimony AnalysisSystematic Biology, 1995
- PROBLEMS WITH ZERO‐LENGTH BRANCHESCladistics, 1994
- Problems With Zero-length BranchesCladistics, 1994
- PARSIMONY, HOMOLOGY AND THE ANALYSIS OF MULTISTATE CHARACTERSCladistics, 1992
- ON MISSING ENTRIES IN CLADISTIC ANALYSISCladistics, 1991
- RECONSTRUCTING CHARACTER EVOLUTION ON POLYTOMOUS CLADOGRAMSCladistics, 1989
- Choosing Among Multiple Equally Parsimonious CladogramsCladistics, 1988
- CONSENSUS CLADOGRAMS AND GENERAL CLASSIFICATIONSCladistics, 1985
- Transformation Series AnalysisSystematic Zoology, 1982
- A Successive Approximations Approach to Character WeightingSystematic Zoology, 1969