THE SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE WTO: HOW TO AVOID JUDICIAL ACTIVISM
Open Access
- 1 October 2004
- journal article
- website
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International & Comparative Law Quarterly
- Vol. 53 (4) , 861-895
- https://doi.org/10.1093/iclq/53.4.861
Abstract
THE SEPARATION OF POWERS IN THE WTO: HOW TO AVOID JUDICIAL ACTIVISM - Volume 53 Issue 4 - Lorand BartelsKeywords
This publication has 24 references indexed in Scilit:
- The WTO dispute settlement process: did the negotiators get what they wanted?World Trade Review, 2004
- The Use and Abuse of the International Court of Justice: Cases concerning the Use of Force after NicaraguaEuropean Journal of International Law, 2003
- Tensions between the dispute settlement process and the diplomatic and treaty-making activities of the WTOWorld Trade Review, 2002
- Free Trade, Sovereignty, Democracy: The Future of the World Trade OrganizationJournal of International Economic Law, 2002
- In the Shadow of Law or Power? Consensus-Based Bargaining and Outcomes in the GATT/WTOInternational Organization, 2002
- Has the WTO dispute settlement system exceeded its authority? A consideration of deference shown by the system to member government decisions and its use of issue-avoidance techniquesJournal of International Economic Law, 2001
- Practical suggestions for amicus curiae briefs before WTO adjudicating bodiesJournal of International Economic Law, 2001
- Who Defines Members' Security Interest in the WTO?Leiden Journal of International Law, 1996
- The Relationship between the International Court of Justice and the Security Council in the Light of the Lockerbie CaseAmerican Journal of International Law, 1994
- The Principle Pacta Sunt Servanda and the Nature of Obligation Under International LawAmerican Journal of International Law, 1989