The Impact of Group Processing on Achievement in Cooperative Learning Groups
- 1 June 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in The Journal of Social Psychology
- Vol. 126 (3) , 389-397
- https://doi.org/10.1080/00224545.1986.9713601
Abstract
The impact on achievement of (a) cooperative learning, in which members discussed how well their group was functioning and how they could improve its effectiveness, (b) cooperative learning without any group processing, and (c) individualistic learning were compared on daily achievement, postinstructional achievement, and retention. Third-grade American students (N = 84) were randomly assigned to the three conditions, stratifying for sex and ability level. The results indicate that the high-, medium-, and low-achieving students in the cooperation with group processing condition achieved higher on all three measures than did the students in the other two conditions. Students in the cooperation without group processing condition achieved higher on all three measures than did the students in the individualistic condition.This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Oral discussion, group-to-individual transfer, and achievement in cooperative learning groups.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1985
- Meta-Analysis in Education: How Has It Been Used?Educational Researcher, 1984
- Group versus individual performance: Are N + 1 heads better than one?Psychological Bulletin, 1982
- Group-to-individual and individual-to-group problem-solving transfer.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1981
- Cooperative peer interaction versus individual competition and individualistic efforts: Effects on the acquisition of cognitive reasoning strategies.Journal of Educational Psychology, 1981
- Effects of cooperative, competitive, and individualistic goal structures on achievement: A meta-analysis.Psychological Bulletin, 1981
- Cooperative Learning in Small Groups: Recent Methods and Effects on Achievement, Attitudes, and Ethnic RelationsReview of Educational Research, 1980