The Virtues of Location; Do Property Rights ‘Trump’ Workers' Rights to Self-Organization?
- 1 March 1990
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Environment and Planning D: Society and Space
- Vol. 8 (1) , 53-72
- https://doi.org/10.1068/d080053
Abstract
By statute and custom, labor–management conflict occurs in particular places. In their search for dominance, management often attempt to deny unions access to the site of conflict by invoking their putative property rights. Courts and the US National Labor Relations Board have at times recognized the legitimacy of unions' claims for access to private property. But the relationship between private properly rights and unions' rights to access under Section 7 of the National Labor Relations Act is ambiguous; some courts believe property rights should be protected whatever the virtues of a location for effective labor–management relations. The tensions between these sets of rights are considered in the light of contests of interpretation over Section 7 rights and its relative powers with respect to property rights.Keywords
This publication has 21 references indexed in Scilit:
- State formation and the politics of place: the case of community legal aid clinicsPolitical Geography Quarterly, 1990
- Unions and Communities under SiegePublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1989
- Base and Superstructure: A Reply to Hugh CollinsOxford Journal of Legal Studies, 1989
- Seasonality of freshwater phytoplankton. A global perspectiveAquatic Botany, 1987
- X‐linked muscular dystrophy with early contractures and cardiomyopathy (Emery‐Dreifuss type)Clinical Genetics, 1987
- Case profile: Pseudoureterocele following ESWLUrology, 1987
- AudiovisualsJournal of Education for Business, 1987
- Pluralism as DogmatismCritical Inquiry, 1986
- Historical PluralismCritical Inquiry, 1986
- IX.—Essentially Contested ConceptsProceedings of the Aristotelian Society (Hardback), 1956