Does matching overcome LaLonde's critique of nonexperimental estimators?
Top Cited Papers
- 1 March 2005
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Econometrics
- Vol. 125 (1-2) , 305-353
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jeconom.2004.04.011
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 45 references indexed in Scilit:
- Using Matching to Estimate Treatment Effects: Data Requirements, Matching Metrics, and Monte Carlo EvidenceThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2004
- Propensity Score-Matching Methods for Nonexperimental Causal StudiesThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 2002
- Four Parameters of Interest in the Evaluation of Social ProgramsSouthern Economic Journal, 2001
- Policy-Relevant Treatment EffectsAmerican Economic Review, 2001
- Evaluation Methods for Non‐Experimental DataFiscal Studies, 2000
- Substitution and Dropout Bias in Social Experiments: A Study of an Influential Social ExperimentThe Quarterly Journal of Economics, 2000
- An Evaluation of Public-Sector-Sponsored Continuous Vocational Training Programs in East GermanyThe Journal of Human Resources, 2000
- Earnings and Employment Effects of Continuous Off-the-Job Training in East Germany after UnificationJournal of Business & Economic Statistics, 1999
- Estimating the Effect of Training Programs with Non-Random SelectionThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1984
- The central role of the propensity score in observational studies for causal effectsBiometrika, 1983