Do External Auditors Perform a Corporate Governance Role in Emerging Markets? Evidence from East Asia
Preprint
- 1 January 2001
- preprint
- Published by Elsevier in SSRN Electronic Journal
Abstract
In emerging markets, the concentration of corporate ownership has created agency conflicts between controlling owners and minority shareholders, which are difficult to mitigate through conventional corporate control mechanisms such as boards of directors and takeovers. This study examines whether external independent auditors could be employed as monitors and as bonding mechanisms to alleviate these agency conflicts. Using a broad sample of firms from eight East Asian economies, we document that firms are more likely to employ Big Five auditors when they are subject to the agency problem imbedded in their ownership structure. In addition, among East Asian auditees subject to the agency problem, Big Five auditors charge a higher fee and set a lower audit modification threshold while non-Big Five auditors do not. Taken together, this evidence suggests that Big Five auditors in emerging markets do have a corporate governance role.Keywords
All Related Versions
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysisPublished by Elsevier ,2002
- The separation of ownership and control in East Asian CorporationsPublished by Elsevier ,2000
- The impact of improved auditor independence on audit market concentration in ChinaJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1999
- Corporate Ownership Around the WorldThe Journal of Finance, 1999
- A Survey of Corporate GovernanceThe Journal of Finance, 1997
- Auditor brand name reputations and industry specializationsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1995
- The association between audit quality, retained ownership, and firm-specific risk in U.S. vs. Canadian IPO marketsJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1994
- The effect of audit firm size on audit pricesJournal of Accounting and Economics, 1984
- Agency Problems, Auditing, and the Theory of the Firm: Some EvidenceThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1983
- Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structureJournal of Financial Economics, 1976