Abstract
The recombination and dissociation of H+2 and H+3 ions incident upon metal surfaces leads to H, H2(v‘), and H products rebounding from the surface. A four‐step model for H+2 ‐ion recombination generates H2(v‘) via resonant electron capture through the b 3Σ+u and X 1Σ+g states. A molecular trajectory analysis provides final‐state H2(v‘) distributions for incident energies of 1, 4, 10, and 20 eV. The calculated H2: H+2 yields compare favorably with the observed yields. A similar four‐step model for incident H+3 proceeds via resonant capture to form the H3(2p 2E’→2p 2A1) ground state, in turn dissociating into H+H2(v_‘), with the fragment molecule rebounding to give the final H2(v‘) distribution. Comparing the final populations v‘≥5 for incident H+2 or H+3 shows that the H+3 ion will be more useful than H+2 for H generation via dissociative attachment. Molecular ions incident upon low‐work‐function surfaces generate additional H2(v‘) via resonant electron capture through excited electronic states and provide two additional sources of H production: Direct H production by H dissociation products rebounding from the surface and H production through the formation of H2 in the surface selvage that in turn dissociates into H+H. The H2 in the selvage is formed by resonant capture to the low‐lying vibrational levels of H2(v‘), and complements dissociative attachment to high‐lying levels in the discharge. The H, H2(v‘), and H yields are inventoried for H+3 incident upon barium surfaces.