Further tests of entreaties to avoid hypothetical bias in referendum contingent valuation
- 30 September 2003
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of Environmental Economics and Management
- Vol. 46 (2) , 353-361
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0095-0696(02)00041-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do Explicit Warnings Eliminate the Hypothetical Bias in Elicitation Procedures? Evidence from Field Auctions for SportscardsAmerican Economic Review, 2001
- Unbiased Value Estimates for Environmental Goods: A Cheap Talk Design for the Contingent Valuation MethodAmerican Economic Review, 1999
- Referendum Design and Contingent Valuation: The NOAA Panel's No-vote RecommendationThe Review of Economics and Statistics, 1998
- Experimental Results on Expressed Certainty and Hypothetical Bias in Contingent ValuationSouthern Economic Journal, 1998
- Are Hypothetical Referenda Incentive Compatible?Journal of Political Economy, 1997
- Which Response Format Reveals the Truth about Donations to a Public Good?Land Economics, 1996
- Accuracy in Valuation Is a Matter of DegreeLand Economics, 1988
- A satisfactory benefit cost indicator from contingent valuationJournal of Environmental Economics and Management, 1987
- Market Transactions and Hypothetical Demand Data: A Comparative StudyJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Bureaucratic Agenda Control: Imposition or Bargaining?American Political Science Review, 1983