Inheritance Laws Across Colonies: Causes and Consequences
- 1 June 1984
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 44 (2) , 277-287
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700031880
Abstract
We examine in this paper both the causes and consequences of inheritance laws in the colonies. We argue that the continuation of intestate inheritance laws over the colonial period was due in part to their compatibility with economic efficiency. In the North, multigeniture helped motivate family labor, whereas the passive acceptance of the British inheritance system of primogeniture in the South rested on its promotion of large plantations that could capture economies of scale. In terms of effects, a strong bequest motive in the colonies adopting multigeniture reduced the variability in demographic experiences across colonies with different inheritance systems.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- Land Availability and Fertility in the United States, 1760–1870The Journal of Economic History, 1982
- Contractual Mix in Southern Agriculture since the Civil War: Facts, Hypotheses, and TestsThe Journal of Economic History, 1982
- Tenure choice in Southern agriculture, 1930–1960Explorations in Economic History, 1981
- Law in American HistoryAmerican Journal of Legal History, 1973
- Primogeniture and Entail in Colonial VirginiaThe William and Mary Quarterly, 1968
- The Beginnings of Partible Inheritance in the American ColoniesThe Yale Law Journal, 1942
- The Transition in Virginia from Colony to CommonwealthPublished by Columbia University Press ,1910