Prevalence of Prostate Cancer among Men with a Prostate-Specific Antigen Level ≤4.0 ng per Milliliter
Top Cited Papers
Open Access
- 27 May 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Massachusetts Medical Society in New England Journal of Medicine
- Vol. 350 (22) , 2239-2246
- https://doi.org/10.1056/nejmoa031918
Abstract
The optimal upper limit of the normal range for prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is unknown. We investigated the prevalence of prostate cancer among men in the Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial who had a PSA level of 4.0 ng per milliliter or less. Of 18,882 men enrolled in the prevention trial, 9459 were randomly assigned to receive placebo and had an annual measurement of PSA and a digital rectal examination. Among these 9459 men, 2950 men never had a PSA level of more than 4.0 ng per milliliter or an abnormal digital rectal examination, had a final PSA determination, and underwent a prostate biopsy after being in the study for seven years. Among the 2950 men (age range, 62 to 91 years), prostate cancer was diagnosed in 449 (15.2 percent); 67 of these 449 cancers (14.9 percent) had a Gleason score of 7 or higher. The prevalence of prostate cancer was 6.6 percent among men with a PSA level of up to 0.5 ng per milliliter, 10.1 percent among those with values of 0.6 to 1.0 ng per milliliter, 17.0 percent among those with values of 1.1 to 2.0 ng per milliliter, 23.9 percent among those with values of 2.1 to 3.0 ng per milliliter, and 26.9 percent among those with values of 3.1 to 4.0 ng per milliliter. The prevalence of high-grade cancers increased from 12.5 percent of cancers associated with a PSA level of 0.5 ng per milliliter or less to 25.0 percent of cancers associated with a PSA level of 3.1 to 4.0 ng per milliliter. Biopsy-detected prostate cancer, including high-grade cancers, is not rare among men with PSA levels of 4.0 ng per milliliter or less — levels generally thought to be in the normal range.Keywords
This publication has 26 references indexed in Scilit:
- Effect of Verification Bias on Screening for Prostate Cancer by Measurement of Prostate-Specific AntigenNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- The Influence of Finasteride on the Development of Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 2003
- The Prostate Cancer Prevention Trial: design, status, and promiseWorld Journal of Urology, 2003
- Competing Risk Analysis of Men Aged 55 to 74 Years at Diagnosis Managed Conservatively for Clinically Localized Prostate CancerJAMA, 1998
- Age- and race-specific reference ranges for prostate-specific antigen from a large community-based studyUrology, 1996
- Measurement of Prostate-Specific Antigen in Serum as a Screening Test for Prostate CancerNew England Journal of Medicine, 1991
- Ultrasound-guided prostate biopsy Biopty gun superior to aspirationUrology, 1988
- Tumour Markers in Prostatic Carcinoma. A Comparison of Prostate‐specific Antigen with Acid PhosphataseBritish Journal of Urology, 1987
- Evaluation of prostate-specific antigen and prosttic acid phosphatase as prostate cancer markersUrology, 1986
- Transrectal ultrasound in the diagnosis of prostate cancer: Location, echogenicity, histopathology, and stagingThe Prostate, 1985