Negative results are disappearing from most disciplines and countries
Top Cited Papers
- 11 September 2011
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Scientometrics
- Vol. 90 (3) , 891-904
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11192-011-0494-7
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 59 references indexed in Scilit:
- Legislation for trial registration and data transparencyTrials, 2010
- Transparent and accurate reporting increases reliability, utility, and impact of your research: reporting guidelines and the EQUATOR NetworkBMC Medicine, 2010
- Do Pressures to Publish Increase Scientists' Bias? An Empirical Support from US States DataPLOS ONE, 2010
- The rate of growth in scientific publication and the decline in coverage provided by Science Citation IndexScientometrics, 2010
- Uncovering negative results: Introducing an open access journal "Journal of Pharmaceutical Negative Results"Pharmacognosy Magazine, 2010
- Why Current Publication Practices May Distort SciencePLoS Medicine, 2008
- Systematic Review of the Empirical Evidence of Study Publication Bias and Outcome Reporting BiasPLOS ONE, 2008
- Evolution and Translation of Research Findings: From Bench to WherePLoS Clinical Trials, 2006
- Why Most Published Research Findings Are FalsePLoS Medicine, 2005
- Publication Decisions Revisited: The Effect of the Outcome of Statistical Tests on the Decision to Publish and Vice VersaThe American Statistician, 1995