A practitioner's guide to meta‐analysis
- 1 June 1991
- journal article
- review article
- Published by Wiley in American Journal of Community Psychology
- Vol. 19 (3) , 291-332
- https://doi.org/10.1007/bf00938026
Abstract
Describes the application to community issues of the meta-analytic research strategies increasingly used in many field of psychology. First, we highlight the potential value of meta-analysis to community research. Second, we describe six major steps involved in conducting an effective meta-analysis. These steps include formulating the initial research question(s), locating relevant studies, abstracting critical information from each study, and presenting, analyzing, and interpreting the resultant data. In this guide, the major aspects of meta-analysis are discussed with particular emphasis on the procedures that are most critical to the validity of its conclusions. Greater familiarity with the techniques, issues, and potential of meta-analysis may stimulate investigators to make more effective use of this powerful approach to integrating research in community psychology.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Decision rules for selecting effect sizes in meta-analysis: A review and reanalysis of psychotherapy outcome studies.Psychological Bulletin, 1989
- Research synthesis reviews: an illustrated critique of “hidden” judgments, choices, and compromisesClinical Psychology Review, 1987
- The Meta-Analysis Effect Size Calculator: A Basic Program for Reconstructing Unbiased Effect SizesEducational and Psychological Measurement, 1987
- Policymakers' Use of Social Science ResearchKnowledge, 1986
- On seeking moderator variables in the meta-analysis of correlational data: A Monte Carlo investigation of statistical power and resistance to Type I error.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1986
- Analyzing meta-analysis: Potential problems, an unsuccessful replication, and evaluation criteria.Journal of Applied Psychology, 1985
- A random effects model for effect sizes.Psychological Bulletin, 1983
- A method for assessing the quality of a randomized control trialControlled Clinical Trials, 1981
- The file drawer problem and tolerance for null results.Psychological Bulletin, 1979
- The Coleman Report: Using Inappropriately Designed Achievement TestsAmerican Educational Research Journal, 1975