Immunologic parameters during NOTES compared with laparoscopy in a randomized blinded porcine trial
- 24 September 2008
- journal article
- Published by Springer Nature in Surgical Endoscopy
- Vol. 23 (1) , 178-181
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-008-0162-z
Abstract
It remains unclear if the natural orifice translumenal endoscopic surgery (NOTES) technique is less invasive than laparoscopy. Serum interleukins and peritoneal cellular response have been utilized to support the immunologic difference between open and laparoscopic surgery. We hypothesized that there would be no difference between cytokine levels during NOTES or laparoscopic peritoneoscopy. Twelve pigs were assigned to NOTES or standard laparoscopy with permuted block randomization. Each group underwent 90 min of diagnostic peritoneoscopy using CO2 for laparoscopy and air for NOTES pneumoperitoneum. Blood draws were obtained at baseline, at procedure end, and on postoperative days (POD) 1, 2, and 7. Quantification of cytokines (IL-1b and TNF-α) was performed with a Duo Set Porcine enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (ELISA). Laboratory results were captured by a technician blinded to the research question, and data analysis was performed by an investigator blinded to the procedure using t-test and repeated measures linear model. The study was approved by the institutional animal care and use committee (IACUC). All procedures were successfully completed. One NOTES animal succumbed to hemorrhagic gastritis (day 3). All other animals thrived to POD 14, with no gross infections at necropsy. Animals undergoing laparoscopy had lower mean arterial pH than NOTES animals (p < 0.001). Serum and intraperitoneal white blood cell (WBC) counts were similar between the groups. Mean interleukin-1b levels at baseline, at the end of the procedure and at 48 h did not differ (0.50 and 0.31; p = 0.65). TNF-α levels did not differ at baseline or procedure end but increased in the NOTES group on POD 1, persisting to POD 7. Tumor necrosis factor-α (TNF-α) decreased in the laparoscopy group (p = 0.005). Cytokines and WBC did not differ between laparoscopic and NOTES groups during the initial 24 h. These findings do not currently support the assumption that NOTES is less invasive than laparoscopy. The late TNF-α elevation contradicts other studies and requires further examination.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Natural-orifice transgastric endoscopic peritoneoscopy in humans: Initial clinical trialSurgical Endoscopy, 2007
- Cell Response to SurgeryArchives of Surgery, 2006
- ASGE/SAGES Working Group on Natural Orifice Translumenal Endoscopic SurgerySurgical Endoscopy, 2006
- Manipulation of the small intestine as a cause of the increased inflammatory response after open compared with laparoscopic surgeryBritish Journal of Surgery, 2006
- Transgastric surgery in the abdomen: the dawn of a new era?Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Experimental studies of transgastric gallbladder surgery: cholecystectomy and cholecystogastric anastomosis (videos)Gastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Peroral transgastric endoscopic ligation of fallopian tubes with long-term survival in a porcine modelGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Gastroenterologists as surgeons: what they need to knowGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2005
- Power spectral analysis of heart rate variability during helium pneumoperitoneum: The mechanism of increased cardiac sympathetic activity and its clinical significanceSurgical Endoscopy, 2004
- Flexible transgastric peritoneoscopy: a novel approach to diagnostic and therapeutic interventions in the peritoneal cavityGastrointestinal Endoscopy, 2004