Is traditionally defined complete revascularization needed for patients with multivessel disease treated by elective coronary angioplasty?
- 1 November 1993
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Journal of the American College of Cardiology
- Vol. 22 (5) , 1289-1297
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0735-1097(93)90532-6
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- The degree of revascularization and outcome after multivessel coronary angioplastyAmerican Heart Journal, 1992
- Coronary angioplasty: A therapeutic option for symptomatic patients with two and three vessel coronary diseaseJournal of the American College of Cardiology, 1988
- Degree of revascularization in patients with multivessel coronary disease: a report from the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty Registry.Circulation, 1988
- Coronary angioplasty for patients with multivessel coronary artery disease: Follow-up clinical statusAmerican Heart Journal, 1988
- Does complete revascularization by the conventional method truly provide the best possible results?The Journal of Thoracic and Cardiovascular Surgery, 1986
- Follow-up clinical results in patients undergoing percutaneous transluminal coronary angioplasty.Circulation, 1985
- Importance of complete revascularization in performance of the coronary bypass operationThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1983
- The influence of residual disease after coronary bypass on the 5-year survival rate of 1274 men with coronary artery disease.Circulation, 1982
- An 11 Year Evolution of Coronary Arterial Surgery (1967–1978)Annals of Surgery, 1979
- Improved survival after 5 years in 1,144 patients after coronary bypass surgeryThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1978