Demographic Paradoxes in the Los Angeles Voting Rights Case
- 1 December 1991
- journal article
- Published by SAGE Publications in Evaluation Review
- Vol. 15 (6) , 712-726
- https://doi.org/10.1177/0193841x9101500603
Abstract
As local jurisdictions redistrict in the 1990s, those with a complex demographic mosaic like Los Angeles County's must exercise particular care in fulfilling three legal obligations: first, to protect the voting power of citizens; second, to ensure equal representation for equal numbers of persons; and third, to avoid diluting the voting strength of a protected group. Courts draw on demographic analysis to quantify these legal standards. This article illustrates how such analysis can inform -and potentially confuse -judicial review in Section 2 voting rights claims. In Los Angeles County, efforts to enhance the voting strength of Hispanics risk an equal protection challenge by minority and nonminority citizens in the remaining districts, whose votes get devalued. Demographic analysis exposes potential limitations in using "total population" as the apportionment base and is essential in gauging the actual compactness of a jurisdiction's minority voters.Keywords
This publication has 7 references indexed in Scilit:
- HISPANIC MIGRATION AND POPULATION REDISTRIBUTION IN THE UNITED STATES∗The Professional Geographer, 1989
- A Count of the Uncountable: Estimates of Undocumented Aliens Counted in the 1980 United States CensusDemography, 1987
- Comparison of Two Methods for Estimating the Number of Undocumented Mexican Adults in Los Angeles CountyInternational Migration Review, 1987
- Geographic Distribution of Undocumented Immigrants: Estimates of Undocumented Aliens Counted in the 1980 Census by StatePublished by JSTOR ,1984
- Channelization of Undocumented Mexican Migrants to the U.S.Economic Geography, 1982
- Undocumented Migration from Mexico: Some Geographical QuestionsAnnals of the American Association of Geographers, 1982