The United Nations and Some African Political Attitudes
- 1 January 1964
- journal article
- other
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in International Organization
- Vol. 18 (3) , 499-520
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0020818300012121
Abstract
What constitutes “sovereign statehood”? Elaborate answers can be given under international law, under theories of international relations, under jurisprudence, and under general political philosophy. But from the point of view of African countries the empirical answer is perhaps the simplest. These countries know that it was not when they assumed control of their domestic affairs that they ceased to be colonies. As a matter of experience, many of them found that the ultimate expression of sovereignty was not direct rule internally but direct diplomatic relations with other countries abroad. The very process of attaining independence might, in their case, be reduced to a single catch phrase—“from foreign rule to foreign relations.” In other words, an African colony was said to have attained independence when it had moved from the status of being under foreign rule to the status of conducting foreign relations with full authority.Keywords
This publication has 2 references indexed in Scilit:
- Consent, Colonialism, and SovereigntyPolitical Studies, 1963
- Excesses of Self-DeterminationForeign Affairs, 1953