Significant Difference in the Frequency of Out-of-Phase Endometrial Biopsies Depending on the Use of the Novak Curette or the Flexible Polypropylene Endometrial Biopsy Cannula (‘Pipelle’)
- 1 January 1988
- journal article
- research article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Gynecologic and Obstetric Investigation
- Vol. 26 (4) , 338-340
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000293716
Abstract
A statistically significant difference in the frequency of out-of-phase biopsies was found on comparison of day dating in two sequential series of late luteal endometrial biopsies taken with the standard 4-mm stainless steel Novak curette and a polypropylene cannula (‘Pipelle’). Since the only variable in these two series was the type of biopsy instrument used, it is suggested that the diagnosis of inadequate luteal phase can be affected by an extrinsic non-biological factor, i.e., the type of biopsy instrument used. This technical ‘artifact’ deserves further study.Keywords
This publication has 8 references indexed in Scilit:
- An analysis of endometrial biopsies performed for infertilityFertility and Sterility, 1987
- Quantitative histochemistry of late luteal phase human endometrium**Supported in part by grant HD 17894 from the National Institutes of Health, Bethesda, Maryland, and by the Frackelton Fund of University Hospitals of Cleveland, Cleveland, Ohio.Fertility and Sterility, 1987
- The endometrial biopsy for diagnosis of luteal phase deficiencyFertility and Sterility, 1985
- The late luteal phase in infertile women: comparison of simultaneous endometrial biopsy and progesterone levelsFertility and Sterility, 1985
- Delayed Endometrial Maturation in Women with Normal Progesterone LevelsGynecologic and Obstetric Investigation, 1984
- Endometrial Biopsy in the Evaluation of InfertilityFertility and Sterility, 1980
- DIAGNOSIS OF LUTEAL PHASE INADEQUACY1980
- LUTEAL PHASE DEFICIENCY AND INFERTILITY - DIFFICULTIES ENCOUNTERED IN DIAGNOSIS AND TREATMENT1980