CATEGORY DISCRIMINATION BY PIGEONS USING FIVE POLYMORPHOUS FEATURES
- 1 September 1990
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior
- Vol. 54 (2) , 69-84
- https://doi.org/10.1901/jeab.1990.54-69
Abstract
Eight pigeons were trained to discriminate between sets of color photographs of natural scenes. The scenes differed along five two‐valued dimensions (site, weather, camera distance, camera orientation, and camera height), and all combinations of the feature values were used. One value of each dimension was designated as positive, and slides containing three or more positive feature values were members of the positive stimulus set. Thus, each feature had an equal, low, correlation with reinforcement, and all features had zero correlations with each other. Seven of the 8 pigeons learned this discrimination, and their responding came under the control of all five features. Within the positive and negative stimulus sets, response rates were higher to stimuli that contained more positive feature values. Once discrimination had been achieved, reversal training was given using a subset of the slides. In this subset, only a single feature was correlated with reinforcement. All pigeons learned this reversal successfully and generalized it to additional photographs with the same feature content. After reversal, the original reinforcement contingencies were reinstated, and training was continued using all the slides except those that had been used in reversal. Reversal generalized to these slides to some extent. Analysis of the response rates to individual slides showed that, compared with prereversal training, only the feature that had been subjected to reversal contingencies showed a reversed correlation with response rate. The remaining features showed the same correlation with response rate as they had before reversal training. Thus, reversal on some members of a category following category discrimination training led to generalization to stimuli within the category that were not involved in the reversal, but not to features that were not reversed. It is therefore inappropriate to refer to the pigeons as learning a concept.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- CONNECTIONIST MODELS OF CONDITIONING: A TUTORIALJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1989
- SECONDARY GENERALIZATION AND CATEGORIZATION IN PIGEONSJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1989
- Long‐term Retention of Many Visual Patterns by PigeonsEthology, 1989
- A layered network model of associative learning: Learning to learn and configuration.Psychological Review, 1988
- CHOOSING AMONG NATURAL STIMULIJournal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1987
- Riddles of natural categorizationPhilosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. B, Biological Sciences, 1985
- Discrimination of Polymorphous Stimulus Sets by PigeonsThe Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 1978
- Pigeons Learn the Concept of an ‘A’Perception, 1976
- HIGH‐ORDER CONCEPT FORMATION IN THE PIGEON1Journal of the Experimental Analysis of Behavior, 1974
- Complex Visual Concept in the PigeonScience, 1964