Common tests for rheumatoid factors: poorly standardized but ubiquitous

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Rheumatoid factor (RF) test results reported in the College of American Pathologists' surveys for 1983–1985 lacked inter‐laboratory reliability and mutual validity. Using the 4 most popular commercial kits for RF testing, participating laboratories consistently identified as “positive” or “negative” all but the weakly positive samples. A wide range of titers was reported on qualitative testing, however. One popular kit using a modified sheep red blood cell agglutination technique yielded results that differed markedly from those with other kits. Investigators apparently have paid little attention to these discrepancies. In Arthritis & Rheumatism, from 1983 to 1985, over 50% of the articles that referred directly or indirectly to RFs omitted details of RF methodology. Until a reliable RF test is adopted, it is essential that such methodologic information be specified.