Philosophers assess randomized clinical trials: The need for dialogue
- 30 September 1989
- journal article
- Published by Elsevier in Controlled Clinical Trials
- Vol. 10 (3) , 244-253
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0197-2456(89)90066-4
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Reconciling Bayesian and Frequentist Evidence in the One-Sided Testing ProblemJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- Testing a Point Null Hypothesis: The Irreconcilability of P Values and EvidenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1987
- The Conflict Between Randomized Clinical Trials and the Therapeutic ObligationJournal of Medicine and Philosophy, 1986
- Commentary: The Randomized Clinical Trial: For Whose Benefit?IRB: Ethics & Human Research, 1985
- Leaving Therapy to ChanceHastings Center Report, 1983
- Ethics, philosophy and clinical trials.Journal of Medical Ethics, 1983
- Sequential stopping rules and sequentially adjusted P values: Does one require the other?Controlled Clinical Trials, 1983
- RECENT METHODOLOGICAL CONTRIBUTIONS TO CLINICAL TRIALSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1976
- On the Foundations of Statistical InferenceJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1962
- Sequential Medical PlansBiometrics, 1952