Advantage in using living donors with aberrant hepatic artery for partial liver graft arterialization1

Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
In living-related partial liver transplantation, the feasibility and safety of using left-sided liver grafts from donors with aberrant hepatic arteries remains to be evaluated. Between 1996 and 2000, we harvested left-sided liver grafts from 101 living donors. Hepatic arterial variation in the donors was classified into three types: type I (n=69), normal anatomy; type II (n=24), aberrant left hepatic artery arising from the left gastric artery; and type III (n=8), replaced right hepatic artery arising from the superior mesenteric artery. We performed arterial reconstructions using the donor’s left hepatic artery in 70 cases (69 in type I, 1 in type II), an aberrant left hepatic artery in 24 cases (23 in type II, 1 in type III), and the common hepatic artery in 7 cases (all in type III). The diameter and length of the anastomosed hepatic artery were larger (2.5±0.7 vs. 2.0±0.8 mm, P =0.03) and longer (42.0±14.7 vs. 9.0±7.3 mm, P <0.0001) in cases in which the aberrant left hepatic artery or common hepatic artery was used for the anastomosis (n=31) than in those using the left hepatic artery (n=70). Hepatic arterial occlusion occurred in nine patients, with the incidence of occlusion tending to be lower in the former cases in which aberrant left or common hepatic arteries were used (3.2% vs. 11.4% for the left hepatic artery group, P =0.15). Because thicker and longer arterial branches can be obtained in left-sided liver grafts with aberrant hepatic arteries than in grafts with normal left hepatic arteries, their use is advantageous for safe arterialization in partial liver grafts.