Concentration-controlled compared with conventional antiretroviral therapy for HIV infection
- 1 March 2002
- journal article
- clinical trial
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in AIDS
- Vol. 16 (4) , 551-560
- https://doi.org/10.1097/00002030-200203080-00006
Abstract
To demonstrate the feasibility of a concentration-controlled approach to combination antiretroviral therapy, and to compare the virological responses and safety of this strategy versus conventional fixed-dose therapy. A prospective, randomized, 52 week, open-label trial of concentration-controlled compared with conventional dose zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir therapy conduced in a university-based general clinical research center in the United States. Forty antiretroviral-naive individuals with plasma HIV-RNA levels > 5000 copies/ml. Zidovudine, lamivudine, and indinavir plasma concentrations were measured in all participants. Doses were adjusted in those assigned to concentration-controlled therapy to achieve levels equal to or greater than target values. The proportion of patients who achieved the desired drug concentrations, the proportion of patients with HIV-RNA levels < 50 copies/ml at week 52, and safety and tolerance in the concentration-controlled versus conventional therapy arms. Significantly more concentration-controlled recipients achieved the desired concentration targets for all three drugs: 15 of 16 concentration-controlled recipients compared with nine of 17 conventional recipients (P = 0.017) had HIV-RNA levels < 50 copies/ml at week 52. No difference was observed in the occurrence of drug-related clinical events or laboratory abnormalities between the two treatment arms. Concentration-controlled therapy implemented simultaneously for three antiretroviral agents was feasible, as well tolerated as conventional therapy, and resulted in a greater proportion of recipients with HIV-RNA levels < 50 copies/ml after 52 weeks. These findings provide a scientific basis to challenge the accepted practice of administering the same dose of antiretroviral agents to all adults, ignoring the concentrations actually achieved.Keywords
This publication has 42 references indexed in Scilit:
- Pharmacological Basis for Concentration-Controlled Therapy with Zidovudine, Lamivudine, and IndinavirAntimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 2001
- The Danish Protease Inhibitor Study: A Randomized Study Comparing the Virological Efficacy of 3 Protease Inhibitor–Containing Regimens for the Treatment of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 InfectionThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2000
- Pharmacodynamics of Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1 Protease InhibitorsClinical Infectious Diseases, 2000
- AVANTI 2. Randomized, double-blind trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of zidovudine plus lamivudine versus zidovudine plus lamivudine plus indinavir in HIV-infected antiretroviral-naive patientsAIDS, 2000
- Dual Protease Inhibitor Therapy in HIV-Infected Patients: Pharmacologic Rationale and Clinical BenefitsAnnual Review of Pharmacology and Toxicology, 2000
- Antiviral Effect and Pharmacokinetic Interaction between Nevirapine and Indinavir in Persons Infected with Human Immunodeficiency Virus Type 1The Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1999
- Clinical Pharmacokinetics of LamivudineClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1999
- The drug transporter P-glycoprotein limits oral absorption and brain entry of HIV-1 protease inhibitors.Journal of Clinical Investigation, 1998
- Role of Patient Compliance in Clinical PharmacokineticsClinical Pharmacokinetics, 1994
- Nonparametric Estimation from Incomplete ObservationsJournal of the American Statistical Association, 1958