Did Coal Miners “Owe Their Souls to the Company Store”? Theory and Evidence from the Early 1900s
- 1 September 1986
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 46 (4) , 1011-1029
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700050695
Abstract
Although coal companies may have tried to exploit a local-store monopoly, company-store prices in nonunion areas were appreciably limited by competition from other stores and mines in the same labor market. Company stores persisted in part by lowering transactions costs. Prices at company stores were generally similar to those at nearby independent stores, and higher wages may have compensated for higher store prices at isolated mines. Conditions varied, however, with labor-market tightness. Miners were generally not in debt to the store, nor paid entirely in scrip. Scrip was an advance on payday, when miners received cash.Keywords
This publication has 6 references indexed in Scilit:
- Employment Conditions of Blacks in the Coal Industry, 1900–1930The Journal of Economic History, 1984
- Aliens In Southern Appalachia: Catholics In The Coal Camps, 1900-1940Appalachian Review, 1978
- Vertical Integration, Appropriable Rents, and the Competitive Contracting ProcessThe Journal of Law and Economics, 1978
- Hedonic Prices and Implicit Markets: Product Differentiation in Pure CompetitionJournal of Political Economy, 1974
- The British Truck System in the Nineteenth CenturyJournal of Political Economy, 1957
- The Plight of the Bituminous Coal MinerPublished by University of Pennsylvania Press ,1934