Long Branch Attraction Effects and the Status of “Basal Eukaryotes”: Phylogeny and Structural Analysis of the Ribosomal RNA Gene Cluster of the Free‐living Diplomonad Trepomonas agilis
- 1 March 2000
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in The Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology
- Vol. 47 (2) , 167-177
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1550-7408.2000.tb00028.x
Abstract
The three taxa emerging at the base of the eukaryotic ribosomal RNA phylogenetic tree (Diplomonadida, Microspora, and Parabasalia) include a wide array of parasitic species, and some free‐living organisms that appear to be derived from a parasitic ancestry. The basal position of these taxa, which lack mitochondria, has recently been questioned. I sequenced most of the ribosomal RNA gene cluster of the free‐living diplomonad Trepomonas agilis and a secondary structure model was reconstructed for the SSU rRNA. I conducted a RASA matrix analysis to identify, independently from tree reconstruction, putative long branch attraction effects in the data matrix. The results show that each of the basal clades and the euglenozoan clade act, indeed, as long branches and may have been engaged in a process of accelerated rate of evolution. A nucleotide signature analysis was conducted in the conserved regions for positions defining the three great domains of life (Eubacteria, Archea, and Eukaryota). For the three basal taxa, this analysis showed the presence of a significant number of different non‐eukaryotic nucleotides. A precise study of the nature and location of these nucleotides led to conclusions supporting the results of the RASA analysis. Altogether, these findings suggest that the basal placement of these taxa in the SSU ribosomal RNA phylogenetic tree is artifactual, and flawed by long branch attraction effects.Keywords
This publication has 66 references indexed in Scilit:
- Origin and early evolution of eukaryotes inferred from the amino acid sequences of translation elongation factors 1α/Tu and 2/GPublished by Elsevier ,1999
- Escaping from the Felsenstein Zone by Detecting Long Branches in Phylogenetic DataMolecular Phylogenetics and Evolution, 1997
- A new model for the three-dimensional folding of Escherichia coli 16 s ribosomal RNA. III † . The topography of the functional centre 1 †Paper II in this series is an accompanying paper, Mueller & Brimacombe (1997b). 1Edited by D. E. DraperJournal of Molecular Biology, 1997
- Consensus phylogeny ofDictyosteliumCellular and Molecular Life Sciences, 1995
- Ultrastructure of Ditrichomonas honigbergii N. G., N. Sp. (Parabasalia) and Its Relationship to Amitochondrial ProtistsThe Journal of Eukaryotic Microbiology, 1993
- Phylogenetic Analysis of the Diplomonadida (Wenyon, 1926) Brugerolle, 1975: Evidence for Heterochrony in Protozoa and Against Giardia lamblia as a “Missing Link”The Journal of Protozoology, 1992
- Flagellar and cytoskeletal systems in amitochondrial flagellates: Archamoeba, Metamonada and ParabasalaProtoplasma, 1991
- Evolutionary trees from DNA sequences: A maximum likelihood approachJournal of Molecular Evolution, 1981
- Cases in which Parsimony or Compatibility Methods Will be Positively MisleadingSystematic Zoology, 1978
- Ultrastructure and Vacuolar Movements in the Free‐Living Diplomonad Trepomonas agilis Klebs*The Journal of Protozoology, 1975