Interval and Clinical Cohort Studies: Epidemiological Issues
- 1 June 2007
- journal article
- Published by Mary Ann Liebert Inc in AIDS Research and Human Retroviruses
- Vol. 23 (6) , 769-776
- https://doi.org/10.1089/aid.2006.0171
Abstract
Cohort studies based upon clinic populations and medical records are becoming more abundant due in part to an increasing trend toward electronic medical records and advancement in information technology. This design has been utilized in the HIV setting to great success and involves following individuals as they access medical care. These clinical cohort designs have not been compared to the classic interval cohort design in which individuals are followed at specified intervals that are unrelated to the participants' ongoing health care. The interval and clinical cohort designs are distinguished and the advantages and disadvantages inherent in each design are discussed.Keywords
This publication has 36 references indexed in Scilit:
- Do We Still Need a Cohort Study of Women with HIV Infection?Epidemiology, 1998
- Evolution of the Cohort StudyEpidemiologic Reviews, 1998
- Population-based Cohort StudiesEpidemiologic Reviews, 1998
- Outcomes in Cohort StudiesEpidemiologic Reviews, 1998
- The Alive Study: A Longitudinal Study of HIV-1 Infection in Intravenous Drug Users: Description of MethodsJournal of Drug Issues, 1991
- The natural history of HIV infection in intravenous drug usersAIDS, 1989
- Numbers of CD4+ Cells and the Levels of Core Antigens of and Antibodies to the Human Immunodeficiency Virus as Predictors of AIDS Among Seropositive Homosexual MenThe Journal of Infectious Diseases, 1988
- The development of cohort studies in epidemiology: A reviewJournal of Clinical Epidemiology, 1988
- THE MULTICENTER AIDS COHORT STUDY: RATIONALE, ORGANIZATION, AND SELECTED CHARACTERISTICS OF THE PARTICIPANTSAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1987
- The Mortality of Doctors in Relation to Their Smoking HabitsBMJ, 1954