The chemical evaluation of pyrethrum flowers (Chrysanthemum cinerariaefolium): A comparison of several methods
- 1 July 1938
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Agricultural Science
- Vol. 28 (3) , 456-471
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0021859600050905
Abstract
1. Comparative analyses of pyrethrum flowers have been carried out by the methods of Tattersfield, Seil, Ripert, Haller & Acree and Wilcoxon.2. The methods were of value in indicating the relative richness in pyrethrins of the samples tested, but discrepancies were seen in the absolute values of the pyrethrins I and II recorded. Under present conditions and until a standard method of analysis is agreed upon, it would appear requisite to state the method employed in the evaluation of the flowers.3. The Wilcoxon method has given higher figures for the pyrethrin I content than the Seil method. The degree of divergence between the results depended upon the richness of the flowers, and upon the excess of acid used in distilling the volatile acid in the Seil method. The relationship between the amount of the pyrethrin I acid present and the titration recorded in the Wilcoxon method was not a linear one.4. The question of the solvent to be used for the initial extraction of the flowers has been briefly discussed.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Constituents of Pyrethrum FlowersIndustrial & Engineering Chemistry Analytical Edition, 1935
- The Loss of Toxicity of Pyrethrum Dusts on Exposure to Air and LightThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1932
- The Evaluation of Pyrethrum Flowers (Chrysanthemum Cinerariaefolium)The Journal of Agricultural Science, 1931
- STUDIES ON PYRETHRUM FLOWERS. I. THE QUANTITATIVE DETERMINATION OF THE ACTIVE PRINCIPLESJournal of the American Chemical Society, 1929
- Pyrethrin I and II: Their insecticidal value and estimation in Pyrethrum (Chrysanthemum cinebariaefolium). IThe Journal of Agricultural Science, 1929