Medico-legal aspects of complications following pain relieving blocks
- 1 August 1982
- journal article
- case report
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Pain
- Vol. 13 (4) , 321-331
- https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-3959(82)90001-x
Abstract
Nerve blocks administered for the relief of chronic pain are sometimes followed by complications which give rise to litigation. The grounds for legal action may be that: (1) complications were caused by the procedure; (2) the patient did not consent to the procedure; (3) the procedure was carried out inexpertly; (4) the wrong procedure was performed; (5) the treatment of the complication was inadequate. Many of these problems can be avoided by care in the selection, investigation and documentation of cases, by considered choice and meticulous performance of the block(s) and by adequate attention to aftercare.Keywords
This publication has 5 references indexed in Scilit:
- Record Award for Personal Injuries Sustained as a Result of Negligent Administration of Epidural AnaestheticThe Lancet, 1982
- Book ReviewsBusiness Law Review, 1980
- Inadvertent Epidural Injection of ThiopentalAnesthesia & Analgesia, 1975
- Accidental intrathecal injection of gallamine triethiodideAnaesthesia, 1974
- ADRENALECTOMY FOR HYPERTENSIONThe Lancet, 1955