European Surveillance of Antimicrobial Consumption (ESAC): Data Collection Performance and Methodological Approach
Open Access
- 21 June 2004
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in British Journal of Clinical Pharmacology
- Vol. 58 (4) , 419-428
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2125.2004.02164.x
Abstract
Background Europe is a continent with strong public healthcare systems, but diverging antibiotic policies and resistance patterns. Aims To describe the performance and methodological approach in a retrospective data collection effort (1997–2001), through an international network of surveillance systems, aiming to collect publicly available, comparable and reliable data on antibiotic use in Europe. Methods A central multidisciplinary management team co‐ordinated a network of national representatives, liasing with national data providers and bodies responsible for antibiotic policy. The data collected were screened for bias, using a checklist. We focused on detection bias in sample and census data; errors in assigning medicinal product packages to the Anatomical Therapeutic Chemical Classification (ATC); errors in calculations of defined daily doses (DDD) per package; bias by over‐the‐counter sales and parallel trade; and bias in ambulatory care (AC)/hospital care (HC) mix. Datasets were corrected after national feedback, and classified as valid; valid but with minor bias; not valid. Results Of the 31 participating countries, 21 countries delivered AC data suitable for cross‐national comparison (14 for all 5 years). Of these, 17 countries provided data on a quarterly basis for at least 1 year. For HC, 14 countries were able to deliver valid data (nine for all 5 years). A valid estimate of the total exposure of national populations to human antibiotic consumption could be made in 17 countries. Conclusion In cross‐national comparisons of antibiotic consumption in Europe, methodological rigour in correcting for various sources of bias and checking the validity of ATC/DDD assignment is needed.Keywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- Cross-cultural differences in lay attitudes and utilisation of antibiotics in a Belgian and a Dutch cityPatient Education and Counseling, 2002
- Antibiotic Prescription Rates Vary Markedly Between 13 European CountriesScandinavian Journal of Infectious Diseases, 2002
- Variation in antibiotic use in the European UnionThe Lancet, 2001
- [Infections and use of antibiotics in nursing homes].2001
- Making sense of antimicrobial use and resistance surveillance data: application of ARIMA and transfer function modelsClinical Microbiology & Infection, 2001
- Different versions of the anatomical therapeutic chemical classification system and the defined daily dose – are drug utilisation data comparable?European Journal of Clinical Pharmacology, 2000
- Antibiotic Use in Long-Term–Care Facilities: Many Unanswered QuestionsInfection Control & Hospital Epidemiology, 2000
- Community acquired infections and bacterial resistanceBMJ, 1998
- Use of Antimicrobial Agents and Drug ResistanceNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- Editorial Response: Antibiotic ArmageddonClinical Infectious Diseases, 1997