Notes on two lemmas concerning the Epstein zeta-function
- 1 January 1964
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in Proceedings of the Glasgow Mathematical Association
- Vol. 6 (4) , 202-204
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s2040618500035036
Abstract
1. We use Cassels's notation and define h (m, n), Q (m, n), Zh (s), Zh (1) – ZQ (1) and G (x, y) as in [1]. Rankin [5] proved that the Epstein zeta-function Zh (s) satisfies, for s ≧ 1·035, theTHEOREM. For s > 0, Zh (s) — ZQ (s) ≧ 0 with equality if and only ifh is equivalent to Q. Rankin then asked whether the theorem is true for all s > 1. Cassels [1] answered this question in the affirmative and proved further that the theorem is true for all s > 0.Keywords
This publication has 4 references indexed in Scilit:
- A lemma about the Epstein zeta-functionProceedings of the Glasgow Mathematical Association, 1964
- CorrigendumProceedings of the Glasgow Mathematical Association, 1963
- On a problem of Rankin about the Epstein zeta-functionProceedings of the Glasgow Mathematical Association, 1959
- A Minimum Problem for the Epstein Zeta-FunctionProceedings of the Glasgow Mathematical Association, 1953