Should each core with prostate cancer be assigned a separate gleason score?
- 1 September 2003
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Elsevier in Human Pathology
- Vol. 34 (9) , 911-914
- https://doi.org/10.1016/s0046-8177(03)00338-1
Abstract
No abstract availableKeywords
This publication has 13 references indexed in Scilit:
- THE PATHOLOGICAL INTERPRETATION AND SIGNIFICANCE OF PROSTATE NEEDLE BIOPSY FINDINGS: IMPLICATIONS AND CURRENT CONTROVERSIESJournal of Urology, 2001
- Biological Determinants of Cancer Progression in Men With Prostate CancerJAMA, 1999
- A Preoperative Nomogram for Disease Recurrence Following Radical Prostatectomy for Prostate CancerJNCI Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 1998
- Combination of prostate-specific antigen, clinical stage, and Gleason score to predict pathological stage of localized prostate cancer. A multi-institutional updatePublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- Correlation of Prostate Needle Biopsy and Radical Prostatectomy Gleason Grade in Academic and Community SettingsThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1997
- An Algorithm for Predicting Nonorgan Confined Prostate Cancer Using the Results Obtained from Sextant Core Biopsies with Prostate Specific Antigen LevelJournal of Urology, 1996
- Prediction of Progression Following Radical ProstatectomyThe American Journal of Surgical Pathology, 1996
- The role of transrectal ultrasound-guided biopsy-based staging, preoperative serum prostate-specific antigen, and biopsy gleason score in prediction of final pathologic diagnosis in prostate cancerUrology, 1995
- Histologic differentiation, cancer volume, and pelvic lymph node metastasis in adenocarcinoma of the prostateCancer, 1990
- Prediction of Prognosis for Prostatic Adenocarcinoma by Combined Histological Grading and Clinical StagingJournal of Urology, 1974