The Rise and Fall of the Manorial System: A Critical Comment
- 1 December 1972
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in The Journal of Economic History
- Vol. 32 (4) , 938-944
- https://doi.org/10.1017/s0022050700071217
Abstract
In a recent issue of this Journal North and Thomas outlined a model of the rise and fall of the manorial system, with special reference to England. Unfortunately, their model contains a number of inaccuracies which weaken quite seriously its applicability. The propositions of the model are based upon a confusion of terms and an oversight of authorities, both of which have led to a questionable factual and theoretical interpretation. In the following paragraphs an attempt will be made to elaborate upon these criticisms, and to suggest an alternative approach.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- The fifteenth centuryPublished by Cambridge University Press (CUP) ,1973
- The Rise and Fall of the Manorial System: A Theoretical ModelThe Journal of Economic History, 1971
- The Idea of Historical Progress and Its AssumptionsHistory and Theory, 1971
- The Utility of the Equilibrium Model in the Study of Social Change*,1American Anthropologist, 1968
- Marc Bloch and the Logic of Comparative HistoryHistory and Theory, 1967
- Economic Relationships in the Decline of Feudalism: An Examination of Economic Interdependence and Social ChangeHistory and Theory, 1967
- Reflections on the PeasantryPacific Viewpoint, 1962
- Marc Bloch's Comparative Method and the Rural History of Mediaeval EnglandMediaeval Studies, 1962
- The Evolution of Feudal Rent in England from the XIth to the XVth CenturiesPast & Present, 1955
- The Rise of a Money EconomyThe Economic History Review, 1944