Medical Decision Making and Elective Surgery: The Case of Hysterectomy
- 1 September 1985
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Risk Analysis
- Vol. 5 (3) , 241-251
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1539-6924.1985.tb00176.x
Abstract
Review and analyses of three sources of data are presented indicating that 25% of hysterectomies are elective. Annual mortality associated with elective hysterectomy is estimated to be 319, or about 12,122 woman years. Cost-benefit analyses of mortality, life expectancy, morbidity, psychological sequelae, as well as dollar expenditures, reveal high costs and relatively limited benefits. Explanations for this apparent anomaly in decision making are explored and include economic incentives, system structure, sexism, and cancer prophylaxis. Principles of risk perception are discussed in terms of potential biases associated with the cancer prophylaxis motive. It is suggested that physicians' judgements of risk may be more salient to the decision process than those of prospective patients.Keywords
This publication has 34 references indexed in Scilit:
- Variations in Medical Care among Small AreasScientific American, 1982
- Psychiatric status after hysterectomy. A one-year prospective follow-upPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1980
- Surgical Decision MakingAnnals of Surgery, 1979
- Second Opinion Elective Surgery Programs: Outcome Status over TimeMedical Care, 1978
- The Elective Surgery Second Opinion ProgramAnnals of Surgery, 1978
- A POST-HYSTERECTOMY SYNDROMEThe Lancet, 1974
- Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and BiasesScience, 1974
- Small Area Variations in Health Care DeliveryScience, 1973
- Availability: A heuristic for judging frequency and probabilityCognitive Psychology, 1973
- Overconfidence in case-study judgments.Journal of Consulting Psychology, 1965