Estimation of sojourn time distributions and false negative rates in screening programmes which use two modalities
- 1 June 1989
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Statistics in Medicine
- Vol. 8 (6) , 743-755
- https://doi.org/10.1002/sim.4780080611
Abstract
Day and Walter derived methods of joint maximum likelihood estimation for the sojourn time distribution and the false negative rate for a screening programme. Their methods are not directly applicable to a programme which uses alternate screening by two modalities whose sojourn times and false negative rates will differ. A modification is proposed and the results applied to data from the Edinburgh Randomised Trial of Breast Cancer Screening. This enables the effects of mammography and clinical examination to be separated. It is estimated that in a programme using both modalities 79 per cent of tumours arising in regularly screened women would be detected by screening and if the clinical examination were omitted this figure would be reduced by 5 per cent. The confidence intervals are, however, quite wide.Keywords
This publication has 10 references indexed in Scilit:
- Two-Stage Models for the Analysis of Cancer Screening DataBiometrics, 1987
- What is the optimum interval between mammographic screening examinations — An analysis based on the latest results of the Swedish two-county breast cancer screening trialBritish Journal of Cancer, 1987
- The Natural History of Lung Cancer in a Periodically Screened PopulationBiometrics, 1987
- Case‐control studies for estimation of the natural history of preclinical disease from screening dataStatistics in Medicine, 1986
- REDUCTION IN MORTALITY FROM BREAST CANCER AFTER MASS SCREENING WITH MAMMOGRAPHYThe Lancet, 1985
- The Edinburgh randomised trial of screening for breast cancer: Description of methodBritish Journal of Cancer, 1984
- Simplified Models of Screening for Chronic Disease: Estimation Procedures from Mass Screening ProgrammesBiometrics, 1984
- ESTIMATION OF THE DURATION OF A PRE-CLINICAL DISEASE STATE USING SCREENING DATAAmerican Journal of Epidemiology, 1983