The Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium (BMC2) Collaborative Quality Improvement Initiative in Percutaneous Coronary Interventions
Open Access
- 1 October 2002
- journal article
- Published by Wiley in Journal of Interventional Cardiology
- Vol. 15 (5) , 381-386
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-8183.2002.tb01071.x
Abstract
The past decade has been characterized by increased scrutiny of outcomes of surgical and percutaneous coronary interventions (PCIs). This increased scrutiny has led to the development of regional, state, and national databases for outcome assessment and for public reporting. This report describes the initial development of a regional, collaborative, cardiovascular consortium and the progress made so far by this collaborative group. In 1997, a group of hospitals in the state Michigan agreed to create a regional collaborative consortium for the development of a quality improvement program in interventional cardiology. The project included the creation of a comprehensive database of PCIs to be used for risk assessment, feedback on absolute and risk‐adjusted outcomes, and sharing of information. To date, information from nearly 20,000 PCIs have been collected. A risk prediction tool for death in the hospital and additional risk prediction tools for other outcomes have been developed from the data collected, and are currently used by the participating centers for risk assessment and for quality improvement. As the project enters into year 5, the participating centers are deeply engaged in the quality improvement phase, and expansion to a total of 17 hospitals with active PCI programs is in process. In conclusion, the Blue Cross Blue Shield of Michigan Cardiovascular Consortium is an example of a regional collaborative effort to assess and improve quality of care and outcomes that overcome the barriers of traditional market and academic competition.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Multivariate prediction of in-hospital mortality after percutaneous coronary interventions in 1994–1996Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 1999
- Coronary angioplasty volume-outcome relationships for hospitals and cardiologistsPublished by American Medical Association (AMA) ,1997
- A regional intervention to improve the hospital mortality associated with coronary artery bypass graft surgery. The Northern New England Cardiovascular Disease Study GroupJAMA, 1996
- Forming a Coronary Services Network on the Basis of Quality of CareQuality Management in Health Care, 1996
- Coronary angioplasty versus left internal mammary artery grafting for isolated proximal left anterior descending artery stenosisThe Lancet, 1994
- Coronary angioplasty versus coronary artery bypass surgery: the Randomised Intervention Treatment of Angina (RITA) trialThe Lancet, 1993
- Interventional cardiology—An overviewThe American Journal of Cardiology, 1988
- Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary Angioplasty in 1985–1986 and 1977–1981New England Journal of Medicine, 1988
- Long-Term Follow-up after Percutaneous Transluminal Coronary AngioplastyNew England Journal of Medicine, 1987
- TRANSLUMINAL DILATATION OF CORONARY-ARTERY STENOSISThe Lancet, 1978