How Well Does the Traditional Sexual Script Explain Sexual Coercion?
- 11 July 1996
- journal article
- Published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Psychology & Human Sexuality
- Vol. 8 (1-2) , 7-25
- https://doi.org/10.1300/j056v08n01_02
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 29 references indexed in Scilit:
- Predicting Men's Sexual Coercion and Aggression from Attitudes, Dating History, and Sexual ResponseJournal of Psychology & Human Sexuality, 1992
- Coercive sexuality in dating relationships: A situational modelClinical Psychology Review, 1990
- Effects of sexual arousal on men's and women's behavior in sexual disagreement situationsThe Journal of Sex Research, 1988
- Erotophobia‐erotophilia as a dimension of personalityThe Journal of Sex Research, 1988
- Dating couples' disagreements over the desired level of sexual intimacyThe Journal of Sex Research, 1988
- Definiteness and Effectiveness of Women's Responses to Unwanted Sexual Advances: A Laboratory InvestigationBasic and Applied Social Psychology, 1987
- Internal Consistency and Correlates of the Bem Sex Role InventorySocial Psychology Quarterly, 1985
- Date rapists: Differential sexual socialization and relative deprivationArchives of Sexual Behavior, 1985
- The relationship of feminist ideology and date expense sharing to perceptions of sexual aggression in datingThe Journal of Sex Research, 1982
- Cultural myths and supports for rape.Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1980