POPULATION AND POVERTY IN DEPENDENT STATES: LATIN AMERICA CONSIDERED
- 1 August 1990
- Vol. 22 (2) , 121-155
- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8330.1990.tb00203.x
Abstract
"Malthusians maintain that rapid population growth aggravates poverty, while Marxists contend that social formations determine its nature and extent. Each perspective is incomplete, however, since it ignores the insights of the other. Latin American states, characterized by dependent capitalism formations and dominated by ruling elites, are generally incapable of solving the problems of population and poverty. Since population growth under dependent capitalism weakens labor's bargaining position against capital, reduced population growth is emphasized as a labor empowerment strategy the poor can implement on their own to improve their socioeconomic conditions."Keywords
This publication has 23 references indexed in Scilit:
- A structural perspective on labour migration in underdeveloped countriesProgress in Human Geography, 1988
- Landholding, Agricultural Modernization, and Income Concentration: A Mexican ExampleEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 1987
- INDUSTRIAL DEVOLUTION AND THE CRISIS OF INTERNATIONAL CAPITALISMAntipode, 1986
- The Marxian Theory of the StateAntipode, 1985
- Development and the Elimination of PovertyEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 1982
- Income Distribution, Economic Development, and Land ReformAmerican Behavioral Scientist, 1980
- MARX, MALTHUS, AND THE CONCEPT OF NATURAL RESOURCE SCARCITYAntipode, 1979
- A Theory of Fertility: From High Plateau to DestabilizationPopulation and Development Review, 1978
- Colonization as an Approach to Regional Development: Northern Paraná, BrazilEconomic Development and Cultural Change, 1978
- The Economic Activities of Children in a Village in BangladeshPopulation and Development Review, 1977