Mass‐Specific and Whole‐Animal Metabolism Are Not the Same Concept
- 1 January 2001
- journal article
- Published by University of Chicago Press in Physiological and Biochemical Zoology
- Vol. 74 (1) , 147-150
- https://doi.org/10.1086/319310
Abstract
No abstract availableThis publication has 12 references indexed in Scilit:
- On the Comparative Ecological and Evolutionary Significance of Total and Mass‐Specific Rates of MetabolismPhysiological and Biochemical Zoology, 1999
- The use of percentages and size-specific indices to normalize physiological data for variation in body size: wasted time, wasted effort?Comparative Biochemistry and Physiology Part A: Molecular & Integrative Physiology, 1999
- Decline in Pelagic Cephalopod Metabolism With Habitat Depth Reflects Differences in Locomotory EfficiencyThe Biological Bulletin, 1997
- Spurious Correlation and the Fallacy of the Ratio Standard RevisitedJournal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A: Statistics in Society, 1993
- Brain Size and Its Relation to the Rate of Metabolism in MammalsThe American Naturalist, 1989
- The Misuse of Ratios, Indices, and Percentages in Ecophysiological ResearchPhysiological Zoology, 1988
- Metabolism of Squamate Reptiles: Allometric and Ecological RelationshipsPhysiological Zoology, 1985
- Statistical Properties of Ratios. I. Empirical ResultsSystematic Zoology, 1976
- On Ratio Correlation in PetrographyThe Journal of Geology, 1949
- Mathematical contributions to the theory of evolution.—On a form of spurious correlation which may arise when indices are used in the measurement of organsProceedings of the Royal Society of London, 1897