Revisiting the Fetal Loss Rate After Second-Trimester Genetic Amniocentesis
- 1 March 2008
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wolters Kluwer Health in Obstetrics & Gynecology
- Vol. 111 (3) , 589-595
- https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0b013e318162eb53
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To estimate an institution’s specific fetal loss rate after a second-trimester genetic amniocentesis. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort study using our prenatal diagnosis database for all pregnant women presenting for care between 1990 and 2006. We compared the fetal loss rate in women who underwent amniocentesis between 15 and 22 weeks of gestation with those women who did not have any invasive procedure and had a live fetus documented on ultrasound examination between 15 and 22 weeks. Only singleton gestations were included. Logistic regression analysis was used to adjust for potential confounders between the groups. RESULTS: Among 58,436 women meeting the inclusion criteria, complete outcome data were available for 51,557 (88%), 11,746 (91%) in the amniocentesis group and 39,811 (87%) in the group that did not have amniocentesis. The fetal loss (miscarriages and intrauterine fetal death) rate in the amniocentesis group was 0.4% compared with 0.26% in those without amniocentesis (relative risk 1.6, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1–2.2). Fetal loss less than 24 weeks (including induction for ruptured membranes and oligohydramnios) occurred in 0.97% of the amniocentesis group and 0.84% of the group with no procedure (P=.33). The fetal loss rate less than 24 weeks attributable to amniocentesis was 0.13% (95% CI –0.07 to 0.20%) or 1 in 769. The only subgroup that had a significantly higher amniocentesis attributable fetal loss rate was women with a normal serum screen (0.17%, P=.03). CONCLUSION: The institutional fetal loss rate attributable to amniocentesis is 0.13%, or 1 in 769 at Washington University School of Medicine. The total fetal loss rate was not significantly different from that observed in patients who had no procedure. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: IIKeywords
This publication has 14 references indexed in Scilit:
- Miscarriage risk from amniocentesis performed for abnormal maternal serum screeningAmerican Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2007
- ACOG Practice Bulletin No. 77: Screening for Fetal Chromosomal AbnormalitiesObstetrics & Gynecology, 2007
- Pregnancy Loss Rates After Midtrimester AmniocentesisObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Chorionic Villus Sampling Compared With Amniocentesis and the Difference in the Rate of Pregnancy LossObstetrics & Gynecology, 2006
- Diagnostic mid trimester amniocentesis: How safe?American Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology, 2004
- Risk of amniocentesis in women screened positive for Down syndrome with second trimester maternal serum markersPrenatal Diagnosis, 2002
- Genetic amniocentesis in women 20-34 years old: associated risksPrenatal Diagnosis, 2000
- Amniocentesis-Related Fetal Loss: A Cohort StudyObstetrics & Gynecology, 1998
- Incidence of Spontaneous Abortion After Amniocentesis: Influence of Placental Localization and Past Obstetric and Gynecologic HistoryAmerican Journal of Perinatology, 1989
- RANDOMISED CONTROLLED TRIAL OF GENETIC AMNIOCENTESIS IN 4606 LOW-RISK WOMENPublished by Elsevier ,1986