How Much Extra Does “Adequa Te” Peritoneal Dialysis Cost?

Open Access
Publisher Website
Google Scholar
Abstract
Our objective was to investigate the extra cost associated with implementing an adequacy program in peritoneal dialysis (PO) and to evaluate the cost effectiveness of a variety of PO prescriptions. This was a cross-sectional study of all 37 patients attending the PO clinic at a university teaching hospital. Extra costs incurred on dialysate, tubing, and cyclers as a consequence of implementing an adequacy program in PO were measured. Costs per unit KT/V for a variety of PO prescriptions were also calculated. Thirteen patients (35%) required an alteration in prescription for adequacy reasons. The average extra costs incurred for all patients was Cdn. $2,323 per annum, which represents a 16% increase per patient. The most costeffective prescriptions were high volume continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis (CAPO) and automated peritoneal dialysis (APO) with two daytime dwells. The least cost-effective prescriptions were day dry APO and high volume APO with only one daytime dwell. Significant extra expense is incurred when an adequacy program is implemented in PO. This is mainly due to the requirement to put more patients on APO. An alternative pricing policy for PO is suggested.

This publication has 3 references indexed in Scilit: