Vision restoration therapy: confounded by eye movements
Open Access
- 1 July 2005
- journal article
- Published by BMJ in British Journal of Ophthalmology
- Vol. 89 (7) , 792-794
- https://doi.org/10.1136/bjo.2005.072967
Abstract
Recently Sabel, Kenkel, and Kasten co-authored a report showing that vision restoration therapy does not improve field defects in patients with cortical lesions.1 This finding was a disappointment because it dashed hopes that vision restoration therapy might benefit patients who suffer visual field loss from stroke, tumour, or trauma involving the occipital lobe. In a new twist, Sabel and colleagues have now written an editorial stating that “we have no objections to the data as presented” (an unusual remark from the co-authors of a study), followed in the next breath by a long argument repudiating the main thrust of their report.2 If readers are confused, they are not to blame.Keywords
This publication has 11 references indexed in Scilit:
- Disappointing results from Nova Vision's visual restoration therapyBritish Journal of Ophthalmology, 2005
- Vision restoration therapy (VRT) efficacy as assessed by comparative perimetric analysis and subjective questionnaires.2004
- Stability of Visual Field Enlargements Following Computer-Based Restitution Training Results of a Follow-upJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 2001
- Restoration of vision by training of residual functionsCurrent Opinion in Opthalmology, 2000
- Restoration of vision II: residual functions and training-induced visual field enlargement in brain-damaged patients.1999
- Residual Vision in Transition Zones in Patients with Cerebral BlindnessJournal of Clinical and Experimental Neuropsychology, 1998
- Computer-based training for the treatment of partial blindnessNature Medicine, 1998
- The Effect of Perimetric Experience in Patients With GlaucomaArchives of Ophthalmology (1950), 1996
- Receptive field dynamics in adult primary visual cortexNature, 1992
- Reorganization of Retinotopic Cortical Maps in Adult Mammals After Lesions of the RetinaScience, 1990