The Effects of Primary Care Physician Visit Continuity on Patients’ Experiences with Care
- 13 April 2007
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Springer Nature in Journal of General Internal Medicine
- Vol. 22 (6) , 787-793
- https://doi.org/10.1007/s11606-007-0182-8
Abstract
Background Visit continuity is important to patients and valued by physicians. However, it is virtually impossible for primary care physicians (PCPs) to provide care during every paneled patient visit. It remains unclear whether PCP visit discontinuity can be planned in a way that is least disruptive to patients’ experiences with care. Objective This study aims to clarify whether visit continuity affects patients’ experiences with primary care equally for all patients. Design From January 2004 through March 2005, a large multispecialty practice in Massachusetts administered the Ambulatory Care Experience Survey (ACES) monthly to a random sample of patients visiting each of 145 PCPs. The analytic sample includes 14,835 patients with 2 or more primary care visits over the 6 months before being surveyed. Usual Provider Continuity (UPC), an administratively based measure of PCP visit continuity, was calculated for all respondents. Multilevel regression models that accounted for the clustering of patients within physicians modeled the relationship between UPC and each ACES measure. Interaction effects between UPC and gender, education, self-rated health, and PCP–patient relationship duration were tested. Results Physician–patient interaction quality, including physician communication, knowledge of the patient, health promotion support, and organizational access were more strongly influenced by visit continuity among respondents in early stages of a PCP–patient relationship (P < 0.01) and with worse self-rated health (P < 0.01). Conclusions Improvements in physician–patient relationship quality can be achieved by targeting visit continuity improvement efforts to patients who benefit most, particularly those in early stages of a PCP–patient relationship and/or perceive their health as poor.Keywords
This publication has 41 references indexed in Scilit:
- Evaluating Patients’ Experiences with Individual PhysiciansMedical Care, 2006
- Continuity of Care: Is the Personal Doctor Still Important? A Survey of General Practitioners and Family Physicians in England and Wales, the United States, and the NetherlandsAnnals of Family Medicine, 2005
- Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Care Outcomes: A Critical ReviewAnnals of Family Medicine, 2005
- Interpersonal Continuity of Care and Patient Satisfaction: A Critical ReviewAnnals of Family Medicine, 2004
- Patient-Physician Shared Experiences and Value Patients Place on Continuity of CareAnnals of Family Medicine, 2004
- Primary Care And Health System Performance: Adults' Experiences In Five CountriesHealth Affairs, 2004
- Continuity of Primary Care: To Whom Does It Matter and When?Annals of Family Medicine, 2003
- Family Physician Continuity of Care and Emergency Department Use in End-of-Life Cancer CareMedical Care, 2003
- The Relationship Between Continuity of Care and the Health Behaviors of PatientsMedical Care, 1999
- Continuity of care in a university-based practiceAcademic Medicine, 1975