Obscuring Cultural Patterns in the Archaeological Record: A Discussion from Southwestern Archaeology
- 1 July 1987
- journal article
- Published by Cambridge University Press (CUP) in American Antiquity
- Vol. 52 (3) , 565-577
- https://doi.org/10.2307/281599
Abstract
Failure to distinguish clearly between human behavior and cultural behavior, as well as inattention to procedures for evaluating inferences about the past, undermine some recent efforts in archaeological interpretation. Examples from the archaeological literature of the American Southwest show how analytical confusion may arise when research strategies obscure cultural variability. We are especially concerned about instances in which archaeologists assume that variability in archaeological assemblages derives primarily or exclusively from variability in human behavior (rather than cultural behavior) or from noncultural processes that are instrumental in forming the archaeological record. Suggestions for modifying research strategies to avoid these problems are offered.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- Toward the Identification of Formation ProcessesAmerican Antiquity, 1983
- 3. To What Extent Were Early Hominids Carnivorous? An Archaeological PerspectivePublished by Columbia University Press ,1981
- Behavioral Archaeology and the "Pompeii Premise"Journal of Anthropological Research, 1981
- Taphonomy and Paleoecology: A Critical Review of Archaeology's Sister DisciplinesPublished by Elsevier ,1981
- Olorgesailie: Archaeological Studies of a Middle Pleistocene Lake Basin in Kenya. Glynn Ll. IsaacJournal of Anthropological Research, 1977
- On Whallon's Use of Dimensional Analysis of Variance at Guila NaquitzAmerican Antiquity, 1974
- Archaeology As AnthropologyPublished by JSTOR ,1970
- A High Status Burial from Grasshopper Ruin, ArizonaKIVA, 1967
- A Preliminary Analysis of Functional Variability in the Mousterian of Levallois FaciesAmerican Anthropologist, 1966
- Archaeology as AnthropologyAmerican Antiquity, 1962