Effectiveness of Screening Aqueous Contrast Swallow in Detecting Clinically Significant Anastomotic Leaks after Esophagectomy
- 1 April 2005
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in European Surgical Research
- Vol. 37 (2) , 123-128
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000084544
Abstract
Aqueous contrast swallow study is recommended as a screening procedure for the evaluation of esophageal anastomotic integrity following esophagectomy. The aim of this study was to assess the accuracy of water-soluble contrast swallow screening as a predictor of clinically significant anastomotic leak in patients with esophagectomy. The records of 505 consecutive patients undergoing esophagectomy in Mayo Clinic from January 1991 through December 1995 were retrospectively reviewed. 464 (92%) patients had water-soluble contrast swallows performed in the early postoperative period (median postoperative day 7, range 4-11 days). A total of 39 radiological leaks were obtained but only 17 of these had clinical signs of anastomotic leakage. Furthermore, 25 patients who had normal swallow study developed a clinical anastomotic leak. There were therefore 22 (4.7%) false positive and 25 (5.4%) false negative results giving values for the specificity, sensitivity and false negative error rate of the radiological examination of 94.7, 40.4, and 59.5% respectively. Aspiration of the contrast agent was noted on fluoroscopy in 30 (6.5%) patients. Only 2 (0.4%) patients developed aqueous contrast agent-caused aspiration pneumonia. There was no procedure-related mortality. While radiological assessment of esophageal anastomoses in the early postoperative period using aqueous contrast agents appears to be a relatively safe procedure, the poor sensitivity and high false negative error rate of this technique, when performed on postoperative day 7 and in a series with clinical anastomotic leak rate of 9%, is insufficient for it to be worthwhile as a screening procedure.Keywords
This publication has 18 references indexed in Scilit:
- TRANSHIATAL VERSUS IVOR‐LEWIS OESOPHAGECTOMY: IS THERE A DIFFERENCE?Anz Journal of Surgery, 1999
- ROLE OF GASTROGRAFIN STUDY IN THE ASSESSMENT OF ANASTOMOTIC LEAKS FROM CERVICAL OESOPHAGOGASTRIC ANASTOMOSISAnz Journal of Surgery, 1995
- Complications of transhiatal esophagectomyJournal of Surgical Oncology, 1994
- Factors affecting leakage following esophageal anastomosisSurgery Today, 1994
- Transhiatal esophagectomy for carcinoma of the esophagusThe Annals of Thoracic Surgery, 1993
- Prospective randomized study of one- or two-layer anastomosis following oesophageal resection and cervical oesophagogastrostomyBritish Journal of Surgery, 1993
- Gastrografin-Induced Aspiration PneumoniaSouthern Medical Journal, 1992
- Gastric interposition following transhiatal esophagectomy: Radiographic evaluationGastrointestinal Radiology, 1985
- Experimental evaluation of various available contrast agents for use in the upper gastrointestinal tract in case of suspected leakage. Effects on lungsThe British Journal of Radiology, 1984
- Colonic interposition: radiographic evaluationAmerican Journal of Roentgenology, 1984