Combination Therapies and the Theoretical Limits of Evidence-Based Medicine
- 1 May 2001
- journal article
- Published by S. Karger AG in Neuroepidemiology
- Vol. 20 (2) , 57-64
- https://doi.org/10.1159/000054762
Abstract
Advances in molecular pharmacology and surgical, endovascular, and radiation techniques have yielded multiple effective or promising, and potentially complementary, classes of treatments for virtually every major medical disorder. Consequently, determining the optimum combination of therapies for a condition is a burgeoning challenge to clinical trialists and practicing physicians. General phase III trial strategies for testing combination regimens are described, and then applied to two illustrative conditions, Alzheimer disease and ischemic stroke. Strategies for testing combination regimens include: head to head trials of all combinations, which lead to unwieldy trial numbers; very large multi-arm trials, which impractically delay interval information on regimen utility; and hierarchical, serial clinical trials. Systematic literature review revealed seven classes of agents already approved or in late phase III testing for preventing the development or slowing the progression of Alzheimer disease and five for ischemic stroke prevention. Possible combination regimens number 128 (2(7)) for Alzheimer disease and 32 (2(5)) for ischemic stroke. Hierarchical, serial clinical trials would permit identification of the optimum combination of these agent classes for Alzheimer disease through 127 trials, enrolling 63,500 patients, requiring 286 years; for ischemic stroke through 31 trials, enrolling 186,000 patients, requiring 155 years. Marked limitations in the ability of clinical trials to interrogate varied treatment combinations to determine the most effective ensemble exist, and their scope is widely underappreciated. Steps that may attenuate, though not eliminate, the challenge of a surfeit of combination treatment regimens include preclinical testing to identify the most promising regimens, use of surrogate outcome measures in exploratory clinical trials, and use of hierarchical, serial and factorial phase III trials.Keywords
This publication has 16 references indexed in Scilit:
- Use of Estrogens for the Prevention and Treatment of Alzheimer’s DiseaseDementia and Geriatric Cognitive Disorders, 2000
- A Controlled Trial of Sustained-Release Bupropion, a Nicotine Patch, or Both for Smoking CessationNew England Journal of Medicine, 1999
- A Four-Year Randomized Controlled Trial of Hormone Replacement and Bisphosphonate, Alone or in Combination, in Women with Postmenopausal OsteoporosisThe American Journal of Medicine, 1998
- A placebo-controlled, double-blind, randomized trial of an extract of Ginkgo biloba for dementia. North American EGb Study GroupJAMA, 1997
- A Controlled Trial of Selegiline, Alpha-Tocopherol, or Both as Treatment for Alzheimer's DiseaseNew England Journal of Medicine, 1997
- A randomised, blinded, trial of clopidogrel versus aspirin in patients at risk of ischaemic events (CAPRIE)The Lancet, 1996
- European Stroke Prevention Study 2. Dipyridamole and acetylsalicylic acid in the secondary prevention of strokeJournal of the Neurological Sciences, 1996
- Design of clinical trials for drug combinations: cytomegalovirus retinitis — foscarnet and ganciclovir. The CMV retinitis retreatment trialAntiviral Research, 1996
- The Continuing Unethical Use of Placebo ControlsNew England Journal of Medicine, 1994
- A Comparison of Aspirin with Placebo in Patients Treated with Warfarin after Heart-Valve ReplacementNew England Journal of Medicine, 1993