Cell migration strategies in 3-D extracellular matrix: Differences in morphology, cell matrix interactions, and integrin function
- 1 December 1998
- journal article
- research article
- Published by Wiley in Microscopy Research and Technique
- Vol. 43 (5) , 369-378
- https://doi.org/10.1002/(sici)1097-0029(19981201)43:5<369::aid-jemt3>3.0.co;2-6
Abstract
Cell migration in extracellular matrix is a complex process of adhesion and deadhesion events combined with cellular strategies to overcome the biophysical resistance imposed by three‐dimensionally interconnected matrix ligands. Using a 3‐D collagen matrix migration model in combination with computer‐assisted cell tracking for reconstruction of migration paths and confocal microscopy, we investigated molecular principles governing cell‐matrix interactions and migration of different cell types. Highly invasive MV3 melanoma cells and fibroblasts are large and highly polarized cells migrating at low speed (0.1–0.5 μm/min) and at high directional persistence. MV3 melanoma cells utilize adhesive migration strategies as characterized by high β1 integrin surface expression, β1 integrin clustering at interactions with matrix fibers, and β1 integrin‐mediated adhesion for force generation and migration. In contrast, T lymphocytes and dendritic cells are highly mobile cells of lower β1 integrin expression migrating at 10‐ to 40‐fold higher velocities, and directionally unpredictable path profiles. This migration occurs in the absence of focal adhesions and largely independent of β1 integrin‐mediated adhesion. Whereas cell‐matrix interactions of migrating tumor cells result in traction and reorientation of collagen fibers, partial matrix degradation, and pore formation, leukocytes form transient and short‐lived interactions with the collagen lacking structural proteolysis and matrix remodeling. In conclusion, the 3‐D extracellular matrix provides a spatially complex and biomechanically demanding substrate for cell migration, thereby differing from cell migration across planar ligands. Highly adhesive and integrin‐dependent migration strategies detected in morphologically large and slowly migrating cells may result in reorganization of the extracellular matrix, whereas leukocytes favor largely integrin‐independent, rapid, and flexible migration strategies lacking typical focal adhesions and structural matrix remodeling. Microsc. Res. Tech. 43:369–378, 1998.Keywords
This publication has 63 references indexed in Scilit:
- Integrin-ligand binding properties govern cell migration speed through cell-substratum adhesivenessNature, 1997
- Requirement of Receptor-bound Urokinase-type Plasminogen Activator for Integrin αvβ5-directed Cell MigrationJournal of Biological Chemistry, 1996
- Cellular polarization induced by chemokines: a mechanism for leukocyte recruitment?Immunology Today, 1996
- T Lymphocyte Migration: The Influence of Interactions via Adhesion Molecules, the T Cell Receptor, and CytokinesCritical Reviews in Immunology, 1995
- Integrin-cytoskeletal interactions in migrating fibroblasts are dynamic, asymmetric, and regulated.The Journal of cell biology, 1993
- Effect of Collagen Gel Configuration on the Cytoskeleton in Cultured Rat HepatocytesExperimental Cell Research, 1993
- T lymphocyte adhesion to the fibronectin and laminin components of the extracellular matrix is regulated by the CD4 moleculeEuropean Journal of Immunology, 1992
- Morphology of fibroblasts in collagen gels: A study using 400 keV electron microscopy and computer graphicsCell Motility, 1989
- The locomotion of fibroblasts in culture I. Movements of the leading edgeExperimental Cell Research, 1970
- MORPHOGENETIC ASPECTS OF MULTILAYERING IN PETRI DISH CULTURES OF HUMAN FETAL LUNG FIBROBLASTSThe Journal of cell biology, 1969