Pulsed‐field electrophoresis in microlithographic arrays
- 1 January 1996
- journal article
- pulsed field-gel-electrophoresis
- Published by Wiley in Electrophoresis
- Vol. 17 (6) , 1075-1079
- https://doi.org/10.1002/elps.1150170616
Abstract
Transverse pulsed-field electrophoresis of DNA has been conducted in a silicon array engineered by optical lithography and the motion of individual molecules observed by fluorescence microscopy. In strong fields, the molecules can be maintained in highly stretched, linear conformations. When the field is switched through an obtuse angle, they head off in the new direction led by what was formerly their tail end. This backtracking gives rise to fractionation that is linear with molecular weight. A simple prescription exists for choosing the field parameters to obtain a particular range of separation. Since the molecular motions are much more uniform than those that occur in a gel, it is anticipated that the arrays will permit more efficient fractionation than traditional pulsed-field gel electrophoresis. Arrays suitably scaled down in size may be useful for pulsed-field sequencing.Keywords
This publication has 25 references indexed in Scilit:
- Electrophoretic mobility of DNA in gels. II. Systematic experimental study in agarose gelsBiopolymers, 1994
- DNA electrophoresis in microlithographic arraysNature, 1992
- Pulsed-Field Gel ElectrophoresisPublished by Springer Nature ,1989
- Theoretical Studies of DNA During Gel ElectrophoresisScience, 1988
- A model for the separation of large DNA molecules by crossed field gel electrophoresisNucleic Acids Research, 1987
- Separation of Large DNA Molecules by Contour-Clamped Homogeneous Electric FieldsScience, 1986
- Electrophoretic Separations of Large DNA Molecules by Periodic Inversion of the Electric FieldScience, 1986
- Separation of yeast chromosome-sized DNAs by pulsed field gradient gel electrophoresisCell, 1984
- Mobility of DNA in gel electrophoresisBiopolymers, 1982
- Why does the electrophoretic mobility of DNA in gels vary with the length of the molecule?Biopolymers, 1982